Jun 17

As contracts are expiring on our iPhone 3’s I’ve decided to do a cost comparison of the various options on how to buy the new iphone 4, to see which is cheapest.  That is a bit of an oxymoron as they are all very expensive, but which will cost you the least?  So far, with o2 and Orange having released their prices and basing the comparison on a iPhone 4 32GB it looks like o2 simplicity comes out just ahead, which involves buying the phone at full price.  Obviously the costs are front loaded this way, but ongoing it is cheaper.

The only challenge there is that simplicity comes in 12 month blocks, so 18 months doesn’t really exist save that you buy a new phone at full price after 18 months and renew simplicty after 12 months.  This is as a personal contract/tariff rather than a business tariff.

One of the issues now is that all carriers are capping data, which seems like a very backward step to me.

As of 18th June these are my findings.  All prices in £’s

Contract Length
12 18 24
o2 Simplicity
Phone 599 599 599
Contract 15 15 15
TCO 779 869 959
Avg/Mo 64.92 48.28 39.96
o2
Phone - 279 269
Contract - 35 30
TCO - 909 989
Avg/Mo - 50.50 41.21
Orange
Phone - 319 269
Contract - 35 35
TCO - 949 1109
Avg/mo - 52.72 46.21
Vodafone
Phone 269 269
Contract 35 30
TCO 899 989
Avg/mo 49.94 41.21
Three
Phone
Contract
TCO
Avg/mo

What I haven’t done is compare buying a full price phone from apple and shopping around for the cheapest data tariff. t-mobile do have a 30 day contract for £10/month, but no mention of micro SIMS.

  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with:
Jun 17

Most people that we speak to have no idea which country their website is physically hosted.  The geographical location of the servers can have a significant impact on search engine results and SEO.

Google, for example uses a combination of your server location and the domain suffix (e.g. .co.uk, .com) to work out the country of origin of the website.  Domains that have a  .com suffix  are not country specific, so combine that with offshore hosting in say the US and you are going to find it quite difficult to appear on google.co.uk as a UK based search.  In this particular example the location of your servers is extremely important.

If you are a UK based business it is worth checking where your website is hosted, especially if your domain suffix is .com.  You may be wasting your SEO budget on optimising your site when the actual location of the server is causing you problems.

In today’s economy, the price of hosting is often cited as being important in the decision making process. This relatively small difference in actual price between offshore and UK based hosting could cost you considerably in terms of your marketing budget and sales.

Offshore hosting also has another challenge, and that is speed.  Servers based in the US for example will risk displaying more slowly in countries such as the UK, due to the huge distances involved.  Site speed is important for SEO and also paid search.  For PPC a slow site affects your quality score and ultimately how much you get charged for paid search marketing.

When buying hosting, you should consider your server location.  If you have hosting already, check where it is based.  Moving hosting can be time consuming and expensive, so it’s better to consider it right at the start of your website development.

Google does offer a facility in their Webmaster Console to be able to adjust the Geographic targeting, we prefer to use a combination of all of UK based hosting and setting the correct targeting for the business with Google.

  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with:
May 28

What an afternoon!  I sent what I thought was a simple request to Apple Support to try and get a VAT receipt for my recent iPad apps for Keynote, Pages and Numbers.  It was a general request for a VAT receipt for recent purchases.  Having read this article http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/work/small-business/article.html?in_article_id=500346&in_page_id=10 I thought it would be fairly straightforward as Apple must have changed their position on VAT receipts.

How mistaken I was, my very pleasant support represeantative at Apple kindly informed me that the contract of sale is to an end user not a business and therefore they did not have to give me a VAT receipt.  They gave me the following link and just stood behind that.

http://www.apple.com/legal/itunes/uk/terms.html#SALE

I was at first told:

“… since iTunes is based in the US, we are not required to provide customers with VAT receipts. This is included in the Terms of Sale, which you agreed to when you setup iTunes.”

This is factually incorrect, iTunes actually operates from:

iTunes SARL, 8 rue Heinrich Heine, L-1720 Luxembourg, Company Reg No: B 101 120, VAT No: LU 20165772

The dialog then took a different tone once I pointed out their mistake.  They re-enforced that sales are only to consumers.  They were however prepared to provide VAT receipts for apps purchased.  A breakthrough!

“Although I cannot provide the VAT receipts for all of your purchases, I will gladly do so for Apps. Here is the UK Terms of sale for you to look over”

So, being clear of the facts from today’s approach of Apple.  You seem only able to get VAT receipts for apps.  I am yet to get an explanation for other products sold over iTunes, however it does at least allow me to reclaim VAT for the recent iPad apps that I use on my business owned iPad.  I can’t help but think that this is just the first of many such complaints of Apple as the iPad will be used by businesses.

It seems the irrefutable piece of evidence was that iTunes is actually VAT registered.  Also, that Apple are legally obliged to produce VAT receipts on request.  Why they don’t just issue VAT receipts as a matter of course I don’t know.  I’d love someone from Apple to explain that to me.

- silence -

  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with:
May 20

A recap of some of the sessions I attended today at the Omniture Summit.

The keynote presentations were very informative, but primarily designed to give some perspective on the recent takeover of Omniture by Adobe.

The CS5 integration between flash and Omniture was demonstrated in it’s simplicity and offers really tight integration on the surface between both SiteCatalyst and Test & Target.  The latter was demo’d later in the day and really demonstrated the power that marketing users are now given to control behavioural targeting and multivariate testing.

One opinion put forward by Josh James, General Manager of Omniture was that we should be less focussed on cannibalisation of the different channels but to look more at the bigger picture of how the channels complement each other.

Josh also positioned the history behind the CMO being able to turn the tables on other departments in the business, for example keeping sales on task.  Marketing can now deliver quality leads to sales and information is now available on conversion rates slipping.  Cool!

There was also emphasis on looking at business metrics rather than marketing metrics, really look at an integrated approach to understand pipeline, engagement, sentiment, distributed presence, revenue, influence and brand equity.

Adobe’s take-over was discussed by their VP of Corporate Development, Paul Weiskopf.  He positioned the following benefits:

  • Blurred lines between what is content and what is content and applications
  • Multi-device use of the Internet, which places Adobe at the front
  • Optimised creativity, through simple application tagging.

There were some announcements, for example Search Centre Plus now includes facebook marketing.  There is also now a genesis integration between Facebook Open Graph implementation and SiteCatalyst.  This integration is in development, but is essentially sentiment analysis, or as they put it “buzz”.

Some key takeaways from the keynotes were:

  • Really understand your visitor paths to contact pages, to try and understand why people called rather than converted This includes looking at on-site search as there may be key questions that aren’t being answered online.  Analyse and Optimise.
  • Improve internal search, understand why people use it and how.  Cover common misspellings.

Social Media Strategy

This was a bit of a slow session, however some key take aways were that Omniture are very much focussed on the quick wins in social media, namely Facebook.  They can apparently integrate with other mediums through the SiteCatalyst API, if the other party has an API. No specifics were given with other integrations.

Facebook applications are a great way to understand more about your customers, and used in conjunction with the Facebook genesis integration it allows you to get really granular data into Discover – detailed segmentation capability.

Attribution Modelling

Attribution modelling is such a dry subject area but so important to understand.  The presentation was very good in explaining the various attribution models and then that the cookie expiration is a key factor, along with the unique behavioural characteristics of your customers in visiting the site.  Each business is different so there is not set best practice on expiration, it will however have a huge impact on attribution.  The attribution schemes are:

  • Last click
  • First click
  • Linear, even distribution
  • Decaying, where the last click is attributed most decreasing down to
  • the first click
  • Reverse decaying, as above except most value attributed to first click
  • U shaped

Recency and latency are significant factors on the attribution model used.  Omniture’s default is 30 days for a cookie.  the audience had people down to 7 days.

The main takeaway was to really understand the path to conversion, and to use attribution to help in that understanding.

RIA Measurement

This session was really showcasing the integration between CS5 and Omniture.  of note has to be the control that marketing is now given to be able to test almost in real-time without a developer having to be involved.

CS5 is also going to support the open screen project, which will be used to send events back out into Omniture.  An example was given of a player sending meta data via the OSMF.

The key takeaway on RIA is to differentiate between what is a page view and what is an event.  Both are server calls however it keeps your page view metrics intact as just that.  With the rise in RIA’s you need to be careful with this.

Looking forward to Friday’s sessions now.

  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with:
Apr 29

Facebook’s recent launch of their new open graph protocol enabling users to recommend and like individual web pages opens up an interesting debate.  Whereas the old fan pages were created to engage fans within Facebook, the new mechanism enabled by open graph takes the interaction outside of Facebook, but allows the external web page to appear inside a social space.

When adding the open graph implementation for the “like” feature, it is possible to create multiple pages and effectively fans against each page. If you already have a fan page, adding a “like” button will create a new pages within Facebook and therefore multiple places for interacting with your customers.  For small to medium sized companies with potentially limited resources and budget this can pose a challenge as consolidating fans into one way to communicate needs some knowledge of API’s.

If a brand decides to interact with their fans using the new “web page” page, then it does mean for particularly active people on Facebook that updates would disappear off their wall quickly.

I can see a case for both external and fan pages in Facebook, but they really need to integrate the two.  This would allow a particular brand to have multiple web pages associated to a particular fan page or brand.  From a review of the developer documentation it appears the only way is to create an application, but then you are stuck using API call using Graph API to send updates.  As the application can be tied to a particular page, it does get round the multiple page issue. This is an area Facebook need to work on.

This poses some questions.

Is open graph set to replace fan pages of old? Do you continue to invest in your fan pages?

What does open graph mean for SEO? We are already moving away from a pure play on keywords and to leverage authority as a quality signal, now we potentially have another signal.  This is certainly an area to watch as an SEO.

Are Facebook looking to compete with google? A reasonable question, as they now have data about real web pages and can take a more authoritative view on a clean set of search results.  Facebook also have something google don’t, personal information anchored to we pages.

Will Google be interested in taking a feed from Facebook, and add it to their quality signals? Is Facebook looking to expand it’s search position?

Will Facebook look to augment bing’s search results if not with Google?

Regardless of the underlying agenda, some fundamentals are good.  Open Graph implements semantic principles, further supporting the semantic web.  Facebook open graph are very easy to configure which will massively improve take-up.

It’s early days with open graph, but time will tell with the impact it will have with fan pages for B2C brands. From my own experience I can already see potential conflicts.

Web analytics vendors need also pay attention as many have recently announced Facebook measurement solutions.  These may already need to change as there is another variable to consider.  Arguably it does directly attach sentiment to a brand and page, so perhaps Facebook have just made lives a little easier. I’m off to Omniture’s Summit in May where they are launching their Facebook measurement solution, so it will be interesting to hear their position.

One thing is for sure, this is the start of an interesting chapter with Facebook.  Here at Cenetrix we are already integrating open graph and semantic web details into our websites.  Anything that makes a customers life easy to share information and supports a richer experience embracing quality of experience with brands is a good thing.  From a personal perspective I like to see that people have positively rated a brand, so Facebooks “like” features is another signal to the customer to trust a brand.  In my view this is complimentary to reviews and testimonials.

  • Share/Bookmark
Apr 28

I got frustrated with apple slipping the launch of the iPad in the UK and bought one from the US.  First impressions are very favourable as I like the big screen.  It keeps disappearing from my office though,  and even found its way to doing a weekly tesco.com food order.  The real boon for me is that it makes email great when sitting in the house or away from a computer, where I might have once used my iPhone.   The fact that tweetdeck has already launched an ipad app is great, as of writing though i’m still waiting for a facebook app.

What I don’t like however is that the screen gets really grubby quickly so if like me you might watch a movie, write an email, go to a few websites etc. then you tend to notice the finger marks build quickly.  Given the size of the screen you notice this more so than on an iphone.

In order to kurb the imports, apple have very kindly locked down the app store on the ipad, so anyone thinking of buying one from the US – you’ll have limited app availability and you won’t be able to update apps directly from the ipad.  Fear not though as you can just open itunes on your PC or Mac, and look around for ipad apps.  There are a number of them.

Even more frustrating though is that I can’t get the iBooks or iWork apps, so am going to wait until the official release in May, depsite my best efforts to get a US apple account.   Kindle have their reader working, so at least you have the kindle book option in the interim.  I’m not sure whether I’d use it for productivity apps such as spreadsheets and document editing.  Time will tell as to how this new device settles into its use.

Another gripe for me is the lack of flash support.  With a larger screen size you would expect an almost full browser experience, however thankfully you aren’t taken off to a mobile version.  Apple do need to get their flash position sorted out as this will be one of the big let downs and frustrations, compounded by the recent CS5 debacle with Adobe withdrawing support for their flash conversion tools.

Overall though – I can’t wait for more app support, oh and the UK release so I can finally get into updating things without going via iTunes.

  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with:
Feb 03

An interesting debate evolved today centered around tagging best practice, mainly in consideration about the rights or wrongs of tagging at the top or bottom of the page.

The top of the page has the obvious issue that you are beholden to the availability of your analytics provider, so unless you are brave then one to be avoided but in theory gets you the largest set of visitors tracked, even those that click away before the page loads which is arguably not valid, but is it when you consider you may have spent your PPC budget on acquiring them.

The bottom of the page carries less dependency risk if your analytics provider goes down, and is typically where most people would tag their pages.

The positioning of tagging on a page can make 20-30% difference on visitors you track.  Also relevant is the fact that if the site is very slow, or uses  a lot of display advertising then the visitor may have consumed, or scanned the content to make an action/decision before being tracked.  Whether you count these visitors or not becomes quite relevant, especially as this could affect landing page metrics, individual page bounce rate and overall bounce rate.

The evidence is fairly anecdotal, but the moral to this one is be careful where you tag and really think about what purpose your site serves to consider the location of your tagging.  Also consider each type of page, checkout confirmations are a great example of top tagging versus the rest of the site where you may deploy bottom tagging.

By top tagging, I mean anywhere after the <body> tag and bottom tagging, immediately prior to the </body>

  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with:
Dec 18

Google recently introduced a qualification for Google Analytics with its Google Analytics Individual Qualification (IQ). There are a series of informative video’s that are definitely recommended to be watched before taking the test, which costs $50. I have just finished and passed the test.

The test is 90 minutes long and consists of 70 questions, the pass criteria is 75%

Andrew Read - Google Analytics Individual Qualification

Andrew Read - Google Analytics Individual Qualification

  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with:
Nov 06

I’ve been looking for a new mountain bike for some time, frequently visiting our local specialist bike store Peter Handsford in Chandlers Ford. Sadly I just couldn’t afford the price tag on a bike that is suitable to replace my now 10 year old GT XCR 2000, with its great i-drive mechanism. Last week I happened to luck into a visit courtesy of my sons rather broken (and still under warranty) Giant Mountain Bike. They had an ex-demo Gary Fisher Roscoe 3 at just a little over half the RRP of £3k.

The spec of the bike is incredible, lots of carbon fiber making it very light. Hydraulic disk brakes and fully adjustable travel shocks. The handling of the G2 geometry along with full adjustable fox rear and front shocks makes it a great all-rounder. I test drove it down the Clarendon Way, my old GT XCR200, now 10 years old has taken quite a battering on the narrow downhill. It’s not too technical, but take it at speed early in the morning when its wet under tyre and its a heck of a lot of fun and quite challenging.

All in all, superbly impressed with my new Gary Fisher. Hope to get out on it soon for more fun.

I’m incredibly impressed by Peter Hansford, they really took the time to make sure that the bike was optimally setup for my usage and weight while also taking care to make sure that I bought the right bike. The only thing I’d say is, don’t buy a Giant bike if you want to play on muddy hills. My son is better off with my 10 year old GT!

  • Share/Bookmark
Sep 30

Having now successfully fallen off my bike a couple of time, injuring my back and heel I felt it was time to slow down. I’m still practicing the 180 and getting higher in the bowl and also dropping straight in from quarter pipes rather than lowering myself in. Riding off a pipe is a major block I’ve had, made all the easier by a teenager who insisted it was easy to do. He was right, having made me feel so foolish for not just trying it. He was also showing me how to jump up from the quarter pipe onto the down ramp. Having told him I was 38, not 15 and about twice his weight he did see my point that it wasn’t something I was going to do today :-)

Trying to get higher up in the bowl and turning, easy does it….

A rolling drop in sequence. Awesome, such a rush when you drop in!

The question is will I drop in to the bowl next week or bottle it?

  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with:
preload preload preload